NEWS2 Escalation Audit

Audit whether abnormal NEWS2 scores are recognised, escalated, reviewed and documented in line with local deterioration pathways.

Audit Tool
Demo Data · Phase 1 preview

Project identity

Governance and audit scope

Project title
NEWS2 Escalation Audit
Organisation
Demo NHS Trust
Site
Demo General Hospital
Department / ward / unit
Acute Medical Unit
Specialty / pathway
Acute Internal Medicine
Audit cycle
Baseline · Cycle 1
Audit period
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-30
Planned sample size
60
Compliance target
90%

Project team leads

Editable in the Team tab

Audit lead
Dr A. Clinician
Senior clinical sponsor
Dr S. Consultant
Nursing lead
Sr J. Ward
Critical care outreach lead
ACP L. Outreach
Governance / QI lead
Ms G. Quality

Local policy and targets

Referenced for compliance judgements

Local NEWS2 policy
Trust NEWS2 Policy v4.2
Deteriorating patient policy
Deteriorating Adult Patient Policy v3.1
Escalation pathway
Trust NEWS2 Escalation Ladder
CCOT referral criteria
CCOT Referral Criteria v2.0
Target time for clinical review
30 minutes
Target time for repeat observations
60 minutes
EPR / observation system
Trust EPR · Observations Module
Record type
Electronic
Data collection mode
Retrospective

Scope

Wards, groups and NEWS2 trigger categories included

Selected wards / units
AMU A
AMU B
Ward 12
Ward 21
SDEC
Patient groups
Adult inpatients ≥16 with documented NEWS2 trigger
NEWS2 trigger groups
Low-medium (NEWS2 5–6)
High (NEWS2 ≥7)
Individual parameter score of 3

Inclusion and exclusion

Applied at data collection

Inclusion
  • Adults aged 16 years or older (unless locally adapted).
  • Patients with a documented NEWS2 score during the audit period.
  • NEWS2 score meeting local escalation criteria.
  • Patients on selected wards, units, departments or pathways.
  • Electronic, paper or hybrid records depending on local setup.
Exclusion / limitations
  • Paediatric and obstetric patients (unless locally adapted).
  • Patients where NEWS2 was not applicable under local policy.
  • Duplicate records or records outside the audit period.
  • Records unavailable for review or lacking governance approval.
  • Do not enter direct patient identifiers.

Custom data collection fields

Add local fields for this audit. Fields appear on the Data Collection form.

No custom fields yet

Add local fields to capture information your organisation needs alongside the standard NEWS2 escalation criteria.

Governance reminder

Lazomis QI standing statement

Lazomis QIP supports quality improvement, audit and governance activity. It does not replace clinical judgement, professional responsibility, local policy or organisational governance processes. Urgent deterioration must always be escalated through local pathways.